991 F. 2d 787 - Crowell v. A Young a J a
991 F2d 787 Crowell v. A Young a J a
991 F.2d 787
Anthony CROWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Richard A. YOUNG, Regional Administrator, Individually and
in official capacities; David A. Garraghty, Individually
and in official capacities; J. A. Smith, Sargeant,
Individually and in official capacities; All Unknown
Correctional Officers, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 92-6976.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: October 15, 1992
Decided: April 21, 1993
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. John A. MacKenzie, Senior District Judge. (CA-90-1470-N)
Anthony Crowell, Appellant Pro Se.
William Rundahl Coleman, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, for Appellees.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Advertisement
Anthony Crowell appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Crowell v. Young, No. CA-90-1470-N (E.D. Va. Aug. 11, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED