989 F. 2d 492 - Crowell v. Smith
989 F2d 492 Crowell v. Smith
989 F.2d 492
Anthony CROWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
David SMITH, Warden, individually and in his official
capacity and all other unknown correctional officers; Keith
Davis, Assistant Warden, individually and in his official
capacity, Defendants-Appellees.
Anthony Crowell, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
David Smith, Warden, individually and in his official
capacity and all other unknown correctional officers; Keith
Davis, Assistant Warden, individually and in his official
capacity, Defendants-Appellees.
Nos. 93-6021, 93-6068.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 1, 1993
Decided: March 25, 1993
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. John A. MacKenzie, Senior District Judge. (CA-92-1230)
Anthony Crowell, Appellant Pro Se.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Advertisement
Anthony Crowell, a former Virginia prisoner now incarcerated in New Mexico, filed two notices of appeal from the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) action as frivolous, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses no abuse of discretion and that these appeals are without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Crowell v. Smith, No. CA-92-1230 (E.D. Va. Dec. 7, 1992 and Jan. 5, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED