979 F. 2d 848 - Skinner v. Williams
979 F2d 848 Skinner v. Williams
979 F.2d 848
Jerry Carter SKINNER, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
David WILLIAMS; Attorney General of the Commonwealth of
Virginia, Respondents-Appellees.
Jerry Carter SKINNER, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
David WILLIAMS; Attorney General of the Commonwealth of
Virginia, Respondents-Appellees.
Nos. 92-6506, 92-6635.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: August 18, 1992
Decided: October 28, 1992
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-91-797-AM)
Jerry Carter Skinner, Appellant Pro Se.
Robert B. Condon, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
E.D.Va.
DISMISSED.
Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Advertisement
Jerry Carter Skinner seeks to appeal the district court's orders refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C.s 2254 (1988) and denying his motion for reconsideration under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, though we grant Skinner leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny certificates of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeals on the reasoning of the district court. Skinner v. Williams, No. CA-91-797-AM (E.D. Va., Mar. 5 and May 13, 1992).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
We deny Skinner's request for mandamus relief and his motion for appointment of counsel