976 F. 2d 47 - Uithoven v. Bonine
976 F2d 47 Uithoven v. Bonine
976 F.2d 47
298 U.S.App.D.C. 99
Felix UITHOVEN, Appellant,
v.
Larry BONINE, Colonel, United States Army Corps of Engineers, et al.
No. 91-5327.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Aug. 27, 1992.
NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
Before MIKVA, Chief Judge, and BUCKLEY and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Advertisement
Upon consideration of the motion for summary affirmance, the response thereto, and the reply, it is
ORDERED that the motion for summary affirmance be granted. The district court properly dismissed the complaint for improper venue. The merits of the parties' positions are so clear as to justify summary action. See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C.Cir.1987) (per curiam); Walker v. Washington, 627 F.2d 541, 545 (D.C.Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 994 (1980).
The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 15.