976 F. 2d 1445 - United States v. Mincey
976 F2d 1445 United States v. Mincey
976 F.2d 1445
298 U.S.App.D.C. 141
UNITED STATES of America
v.
Valerie Diola MINCEY, Appellant.
No. 92-3026.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Oct. 16, 1992.
NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
Before STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, SENTELLE and KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judges.
JUDGMENT
PER CURIAM.
Advertisement
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See D.C.Cir.Rule 14(c). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Mincey's conviction be affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in the district court's January 7, 1992 memorandum opinion.
The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 15.