96 F. 3d 1439 - Odiana v. V Rickards
96 F3d 1439 Odiana v. V Rickards
96 F.3d 1439
Anthony Ikezau ODIANA, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Carolyn V. RICKARDS, Warden; Brian Smith, Case Manager,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 96-6520.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 22, 1996.
Decided Sept. 4, 1996.
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Anthony Ikezau Odiana, Appellant Pro Se.
Before HALL, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Advertisement
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his Bivens* complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Odiana v. Rickards, No. CA-96-112 (E.D.Va. Mar. 13, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
See Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971)