957 F. 2d 912 - Law Offices of Barry Lenk Pc v. Erdman
957 F2d 912 Law Offices of Barry Lenk Pc v. Erdman
957 F.2d 912
294 U.S.App.D.C. 163
LAW OFFICES OF BARRY R. LENK, P.C.
v.
Phebe ERDMAN, et al., Appellants,
No. 90-5353.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
March 16, 1992.
NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
Before MIKVA, Chief Judge, and RUTH B. GINSBURG and D.H. GINSBURG, Circuit Judges.
JUDGMENT
Per Curiam.
Advertisement
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. See D.C.Cir. Rule 14(c). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court's order filed September 28, 1990, denying appellant's motion to set aside the default judgment, be affirmed substantially for the reasons stated by the district court.
The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir. Rule 15.