95 F. 3d 43 - United States of America v. Poteet
95 F3d 43 United States of America v. Poteet
95 F.3d 43
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff--Appellee,
v.
James Earl POTEET, Defendant--Appellant.
No. 96-6723.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 15, 1996.
Decided Aug. 21, 1996.
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
James Earl Poteet, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.
Before MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Advertisement
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Poteet, Nos. CR-89-136; CA-96-30 (E.D.Va. Apr. 17, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED