948 F. 2d 1337 - Morello v. Department Of Justice
948 F2d 1337 Morello v. Department Of Justice
948 F.2d 1337
292 U.S.App.D.C. 229
Arthur MORELLO, Appellant
v.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al.
No. 90-5378.
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
Nov. 4, 1991.
NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.
Before HARRY T. EDWARDS, SILBERMAN and STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Advertisement
Upon consideration of the motion for summary affirmance and the opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion be granted. Appellant has failed to exhaust his administrative remedies because he has failed to pay the applicable fees under the Freedom of Information Act. See Crooker v. CIA, 577 F.Supp. 1220 (D.D.C.1984). The merits of the parties' position are so clear as to justify summary action. See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley, 819 F.2d, 294, 297 (D.C.Cir.1987) (per curiam); Walker v. Washington, 627 F.2d 541, 545 (D.C.Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 994 (1980).
The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir. Rule 15.