946 F. 2d 885 - Headley v. A Spradley W E P W
946 F2d 885 Headley v. A Spradley W E P W
946 F.2d 885
Federico J. HEADLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
A. SPRADLEY, Stanley Daniels, Edward W. Carey, James E.
Johnson, William P. Rogers, Edward W. Murray,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 91-6040.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 20, 1991.
Decided Oct. 21, 1991.
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, District Judge. (CA-90-468-AM)
Federico J. Headley, appellant pro se.
E.D.Va.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Before NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Advertisement
Federico J. Headley appeals the dismissal of his complaint for failure to pay a court-ordered filing fee. We reverse and remand.
The district court imposed a filing fee based on 15% of the aggregate amount deposited in appellant's account in the six months prior to submission of the complaint. However, this assessment violated Local Rule 28(C) for the Eastern District of Virginia, which only permitted a partial filing fee based on the "average amount on deposit" in the relevant period. See Ortega v. Gellhaar, 914 F.2d 495, 498 (4th Cir.1990) (district court must abide by local rules adopted by court). The later amendment of Rule 28(c) does not cure this violation--the rule in effect on the day the complaint was submitted must be applied.
Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, reverse the order of dismissal, and remand with instructions to recalculate the partial filing fee in accordance with the preamendment version of Local Rule 28(C). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented and argument would not aid the decisional process.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.