946 F. 2d 1564 - Hall v. National Railroad Passenger Corp

Advertisement

946 F2d 1564 Hall v. National Railroad Passenger Corp

946 F.2d 1564

292 U.S.App.D.C. 84

Michael A. HALL
v.
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP., Appellant.

Nos. 90-7134, 90-7143.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

March 19, 1991.

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.

Before D.H. GINSBURG, SENTELLE and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.


Advertisement
view counter
1

Upon consideration of the motion for summary affirmance, the response thereto and the reply and cross appellant's motion to hold appeal in abeyance and to defer briefing, it is

2

ORDERED that the motion for summary affirmance be granted. The district court acted well within its discretion to grant a new trial on the ground that the jury misunderstood its charge. See Schneider v. Lockheed Aircraft Corp., 658 F.2d 835, 849 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 994 (1982). The merits of the parties' positions are so clear as to justify summary action. See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C.Cir.1987) (per curiam); Walker v. Washington, 627 F.2d 541, 545 (D.C.Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 994 (1980). It is

3

FURTHER ORDERED that the remaining motion be dismissed as moot.

4

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir. Rule 15.

Advertisement