944 F. 2d 911 - Goodyear v. W Sullivan Md

CONSENT JUDGMENT AND ORDER*

This matter is before the court for entry of judgment in accordance with the attached stipulation. Upon the basis of that stipulation,

1) the judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma in Case No. 90-205-S is vacated and the matter is remanded to the district court with instructions to remand the matter to the Secretary of Health and Human Services for further administrative proceedings pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g);

2) on remand to the Secretary, plaintiff's claims for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income benefits under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401 et seq. and §§ 1381 et seq., are to be readjudicated consistent with the terms of the parties' stipulation;

3) this appeal is dismissed;

4) each party shall bear its own costs; and

5) the mandate shall enter forthwith.

(Sept. 3, 1991)

It is hereby stipulated, by and between the parties in this action, that this appeal be withdrawn and that this case be remanded to the Secretary of Health and Human Services (the "Secretary") for further administrative proceedings pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Appellant has submitted additional evidence, which consists of reports of medical examinations and the report of a fusion procedure performed between August 1989 and November 1990. This additional evidence is new and material and it could not have been previously considered by the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) when he issued his decision on June 29, 1989. Therefore, appellant has satisfied the good cause requirements for remand under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)

On remand, appellant's claims for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income benefits under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act, respectively, will be readjudicated. The Secretary will remand the case to an ALJ in order to obtain updated medical reports and treatment notes from appellant's treating sources. The ALJ will also obtain an orthopedic consultative examination with a medical assessment. Further, the ALJ will obtain the testimony of a medical expert to clarify the nature and severity of appellant's impairments, and the associated limitations throughout the entire period at issue. Finally, the ALJ will reevaluate appellant's residual functional capacity and subjective complaints in light of all the evidence of record.

/s/ MARK E. BUCHNER

JOHN W. RALEY, JR.

/s/ SCHOEMANN

(214)767-3212