934 F. 2d 319 - Pruitt v. T Dixon
934 F2d 319 Pruitt v. T Dixon
934 F.2d 319
Unpublished Disposition
Robert Rudolph PRUITT, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Gary T. DIXON, Attorney General of North Carolina,
Respondents-Appellees.
No. 91-6017.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 6, 1991.
Decided May 29, 1991.
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, District Judge. (CA-90-228-C)
Robert Rudolph Pruitt, appellant pro se.
Richard Norwood League, Office of the Attorney General, Raleigh, N.C., for appellees.
W.D.N.C.
DISMISSED.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, WILKINSON and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Advertisement
Robert Rudolph Pruitt seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Pruitt v. Dixon, CA-90-228-C (W.D.N.C. Jan. 31, 1991). We deny the motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.