931 F. 2d 886 - Gross v. Centennial Development Company
931 F2d 886 Gross v. Centennial Development Company
931 F.2d 886
Unpublished Disposition
James A. GROSS, Petitioner,
v.
CENTENNIAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, Director, Office of Workers'
Compensation Programs, United States Department of
Labor, Respondents.
No. 91-3004.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 8, 1991.
Decided April 25, 1991.
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.
James A. Gross, petitioner pro se.
Michael John Denney, Marta Kusic, United States Department of Labor, John S. Lopatto III, Washington, D.C., for respondents.
Ben.Rev.Bd.
AFFIRMED.
Before MURNAGHAN, SPROUSE and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Advertisement
James A. Gross seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. Secs. 901 et seq. Our review of the record and the Board's decision and order discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Gross v. Centennial Development Co., 88-3510-BLA (Ben.Rev.Bd. Nov. 26, 1990).1 We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
In view of our disposition of this case, we find it unnecessary to address Centennial's contention that it received untimely notification of Gross' claim