927 F. 2d 608 - Clarno v. Maass
927 F2d 608 Clarno v. Maass
927 F.2d 608
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Danny CLARNO, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Fred MAASS, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 90-35437.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Jan. 9, 1991.
Decided March 7, 1991.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, No. CV-89-6385-JAR; James A. Redden, District Judge, Presiding.
D.Or.
AFFIRMED.
Before JAMES R. BROWNING, CANBY and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
Advertisement
MEMORANDUM*
Danny Clarno appeals the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. He was convicted in State Court of forcibly sodomizing his wife, and he now claims that such behavior is beyond the reach of the law because it falls within his "right of marital privacy." We find this claim to be wholly without merit. See Trammel v. United States, 445 U.S. 40 (1980).
He claims also that his right to a speedy trial was denied. However, the delays to which he points were occasioned at his own insistence. Thus, this claim also has no merit.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3