923 F2d 861 Ferdik v. Flamenco Mental Health Center II

923 F.2d 861

Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Michael Henry FERDIK, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
FLAMENCO MENTAL HEALTH CENTER, Defendant,
and
David Fernandez, Dr., Ron Dupris, David Tees, Art Bourujy,
Walter White, Joe Medina, Esteban Velos, Director,
Doug Peterson, Psychologist II,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 90-15630.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 7, 1990.*
Decided Jan. 23, 1991.

Before FARRIS, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.


Advertisement
view counter
1

MEMORANDUM**

2

Michael Ferdik appeals the District Court's summary judgment dismissing his claims against Flamenco Mental Health Center, et al. We affirm.

3

This lawsuit merely reiterates the claims made by Ferdik in five previous lawsuits. A litigant whose action has been prosecuted to final judgment is precluded from relitigating claims that were or could have been raised in the original action. Federated Department Stores v. Moitie, 452 U.S. 394, 398 (1981). Therefore, Ferdik's claims are barred by res judicata.

4

AFFIRMED.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a) and Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3