920 F. 2d 927 - Rucker v. T Dixon
920 F2d 927 Rucker v. T Dixon
920 F.2d 927
Unpublished Disposition
Reginald Vann RUCKER, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Gary T. DIXON, Warden, Attorney General of North Carolina,
Respondents-Appellees.
No. 90-6151.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 3, 1990.
Decided Dec. 18, 1990.
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge. (CA-89-919-G)
Reginald Vann Rucker, appellant pro se.
Richard Norwood League, Office of the Attorney General, Raleigh, N.C., for appellees.
M.D.N.C.
DISMISSED.
Before K.K. HALL, MURNAGHAN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Advertisement
Reginald Vann Rucker seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Rucker v. Dixon, CA-89-919-G (M.D.N.C. Aug. 28, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED