MEMORANDUM DECISIO!\S.
1023
STAPYLTON v. ETHERIDGE. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. February 21, 1898.) l'\o. 578. In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of I1'lorida. .John E. Hartridge, for plaintiff in error. S..J. Bowie and A. 'V. Cockrell, for defendant in error. Dismisseu .. per stipulation of counsel. TAXGYE v. et al. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. MIV'!'h 7, 1899.) No. 577. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Tennessee. Brown & Spurlock, for appellant. Eakin & Goree and R. L, Bright, for appellees. Dismissed, per stipulation.
UNITED STATI"S v. Sixth Circuit. Mareh 7, of the United States for S. Atty. Dismissed, for counsel.
HAHSIIA (three cases). (Circuit 18D9.) Nos. 5!J2-5\M. In Error to the Eastern Distriet of ::\Iichigan. want of jurisdiction, on motion of
Court of Appeals,. the District Court J. 'V. Finney, U. plaintiff in error's
UNITED STATES v. J. ALLSTON 1\EWALL & CO. (Circuit Court of ApFirst Circuit. ::\lareh 20. lRlJH.) No. 284. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of ::\lassachusetts. Boyd B. Jones, U. S. Atty., and Albert H. Washburn, Asst. U. S. Atty. Dismissed, See [)1 Ped.525. VON EMPEHGER v. CITY OF DETHOlT. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. March 7, I8!J!).) 1\0. Go7. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Michigan. Dickerson & Brown, for appellant. John J. Speed and Parker & Burton, for appellee. Dismissed, for failure to print record, pursuant to twenty-thir<l rule.
WES'l'EHN ELECTItIC CO. v. CITI7.EXS' TEL. CO. et al. (Circuit Conrt of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. ::\larch 27, 18W.) Xo. fi74. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States fo" tlw Wcstern District of ::\'Iichigan. Barton & Bro,vn, for appellant. Bundy &. Travis, Stewart & Stewart, aud Char!ps C. Bulkley, for appellees. Dismissed, on motion of appellant. See 89 Fed. 670. WILSON TItAXSI'r CO. v. KIXIIUE. (Circuit Conrt of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. March 31, lRnn.) Xo. 691. In IDrror to the Circuit CO\ll't of the Unite'l States for the Eastern District of ::\1ichigan. Goulrler & Holding. for plaintiff in error. Chadwick & McIlwain, for defendant in error. liio opinion. Affirmed, with costs. END OF CASES IN VOL. 92.