915 F. 2d 1565 - Tindall v. R Sutton
915 F2d 1565 Tindall v. R Sutton
915 F.2d 1565
Unpublished Disposition
Lamont TINDALL, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Earnest R. SUTTON, Superintendent, Attorney General of North
Carolina, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 89-7805.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 27, 1990.
Decided Sept. 28, 1990.
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Franklin T. Dupree, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-89-139-HC-D)
Lamont Tindall, appellant pro se.
Richard Norwood League, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, N.C., for appellees.
E.D.N.C.
DISMISSED.
Before SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Advertisement
Lamont Tindall seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Tindall v. Sutton, CA-89-139-HC-D (E.D.N.C. Sept. 6, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.*
DISMISSED.
In view of our disposition of this case, we deny Tindall's motion for appointment of counsel