904 F. 2d 700 - Ginn v. Frye
904 F2d 700 Ginn v. Frye
904 F.2d 700
Unpublished Disposition
Charles P. GINN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Dr. FRYE; John Taylor, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 90-7264.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 7, 1990.
Decided: May 23, 1990.
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. B. Waugh Crigler, United States Magistrate. (C/A No. 89-695-R).
Charles P. Ginn, appellant pro se.
Edward Meade Macon, McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, Richmond, Va.; Jeanette Dian Rogers, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Va., for appellees.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Advertisement
Charles P. Ginn appeals from the magistrate's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983.* Our review of the record and the magistrate's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate. Ginn v. Frye, C/A No. 89-695-R (W.D.Va. Jan. 17, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636