899 F2d 18 Kaiser Development Company v. City and County of Honolulu Kaiser Development Company B S H

899 F.2d 18w

Unpublished Disposition

KAISER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, aka Kacor Development Company, a
California corporation; Kaiser Hawaii Kai
Development Co., a Nevada corporation, Plaintiffs,
and
Richard Lyman, Jr.; Matsuo Takabuki; Myron B. Thompson;
William S. Richardson; Henry H. Peters, Jr.,
Plaintiffs/Intervenors-Appellants,
v.
CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, a municipal corporation,
Defendant-Appellee.
KAISER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, aka Kacor Development Company, a
California corporation; Kaiser Hawaii Kai
Development Co., a Nevada corporation,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
and
Richard Lyman, Jr.; Matsuo Takabuki; Myron B. Thompson;
William S. Richardson; Henry H. Peters, Jr.,
Plaintiffs/Intervenors,
v.
CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, a municipal corporation,
Defendant-Appellee.

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.


Advertisement
view counter
1

Nos. 87-2689, 87-2690.

2

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Nov. 16, 1988.
Decided March 21, 1990.
Amended and Redesignated as a Per Curiam Opinion for
Publication Sept. 4, 1990.

3

NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION. SEE 913 F.2D 573.