899 F2d 1225 Jackson v. Harris

899 F.2d 1225

Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Curtis JACKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Patricia Roberts HARRIS, Secretary, Health and Human
Services, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 88-15680.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 7, 1990*.
Decided April 4, 1990.

Before CHOY, THOMPSON and TROTT, Circuit Judges.


Advertisement
view counter
1

ORDER AFFIRMING SUMMARY JUDGMENT**

2

Plaintiff Curtis Jackson appeals from the district court's Order, filed September 23, 1988, granting Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment.

3

We affirm for the reasons stated in the Magistrate's Proposed Findings and Recommendation, filed July 25, 1988, as adopted by the district court by its Order. Accordingly, we need not decide the issue of whether plaintiff's failure to object to the magistrate's report waived the right to appeal.

4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Circuit Rule 34-4

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.Rule 36-3