894 F. 2d 402 - Scarborough v. Norwood
894 F2d 402 Scarborough v. Norwood
894 F.2d 402
Unpublished Disposition
Lewis M. SCARBOROUGH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Mike NORWOOD; Randy E. Lee, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 89-6861.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 30, 1989.
Decided: Jan. 9, 1990.
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Lewis M. Scarborough, appellant pro se.
Valerie Bateman, Office of the Attorney General, for appellees.
Before MURNAGHAN and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Advertisement
Lewis M. Scarborough appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Scarborough v. Norwood, CA-88-361-CRT-F (E.D.N.C. Oct. 3, 1989).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.