MEMORANDUM DECISIONS.
1015
CONSOLIDATED ELEVATOR CO. v. NICHOLS et at. (Circuit Court ot Appeals. Seventh Circuit. October 3, 1898.) No. 523. Appeal from Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Illinois. S. P. '''heeler, for appellant.. Joseph S. Laurie, for appellees. Dismissed on motion of appellant.. DA:."IELS et a!. v. LEFAVOUR et at (Circuit Court of Appeals. Second Circuit. i\"ovember 6, 1896.) No.3. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Abram Kling, fUl' appellants. Holmes & Adams, for appellees. Dismissed upon settlement of the case. DAVIDSON v. MEXICAN NAT. R. CO. (Circuit Couft of Appeals, Second Circuit. April 30. 1895.) No. 41. In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York. Parsons, Shepard & Ogden. for plaintiff in error. Evarts, Chonte & Beaman, for defendant in error. No opinion. Reversed, pursuant to answer of the supreme court on certificate. 157 U. S. 201, 15 Sup. Ct. 563.
DE LDfA v. eXITED STATES. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. March 15, 1897.) Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Robert 'Weil, for appellant. Wallace Macfarlane. U. S. Atty. Dismissed, pursuant to the sixteenth rule, for failure to docket. DIECKERHOFF v. UNITED STATES. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. :\Iay 22, 1893.) Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Curie, Smith & Jlacl,ie, for appellant. Edward Jlitchell, U. S. Atty. Dismissed by consent, pursuant to the twentieth rule. DIXON-WOODS CO. v. UNITED GLASS CO. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Jlarch 18, 1897.) Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of New Yor]{. Charles A. 'I.'alcott, for appellant. Cookingham & Sherman, for appellee. Dismissed on consent, pursuant to the twentieth rule.
DULUTH TRrST CO. v. GREAT 'VESTERN JfFG. CO. et at (Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. 2, 18fJS.) No. 1,078. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of :\linnesota. Jed L. Washburn, for appellees. Docketed and dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the sixteenth rule, on motion of appellees.
THE ELDORADO. THE (Circuit Court of Appeals. Second Circuit. April 20, 1800.) No. 159. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Chas. H. Tweed, for appellant clnimant of the Eldorado. Hobinson. Biddle & 'Vard. for appellee S. S. Co. Cnrpellter & Park. for appdlee claimant of the Florence. Ko opinion. Afiirmed. See 68 Fed. 940.
1016 ary 13, 1897.)
89
FEDERAL REPORTER;
JllRHARDT v. HAHN. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. FebruNo.8. In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Wallace Macfarlane, U. S. Atty. Comstock & Brown, for defendant in error. Dismissed on consent, pursuant to the twentieth rule. See 5 C. C. A. 99, 55 Fed. 273; 24 C. C. A. 265, 78 Fed. 620.
FASSETT v. VANDERBILT. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. May 19, 1897.) No. 125. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Edward Mitchell, U. S. Atty. Root & Clarke, for appellee. No opinion. Reversed, pursuant to the opinion of the supreme court on certiorari. The Conqueror,166 U. S. 110, 17 Sup. Ct. 510.
FINK v. UNITED STATES. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.) Questions of law certified to the supreme court of the United States. See 18 Sup. Ct. 770. THE FLORIDA. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. January 20, 1897.) No. 87. Appeal from the District Court of the U);lited States for the Southern District of New York. Wilcox, Adams & Green, for appellant Berwind-White Coal-Min. Co. Stimson & Williams, for appellee the li'lorida. Dismissed on consent, pursuant to the twentieth rule. See 56 Fed. 614.
FOSTER v. WERTHEIMER. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. October 21, 1896.) Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Cowen & Dickerson and Nicoll & Brown, for appellant. Gifford & Bull, for appellee. DisnHssed by consent, without costs.
GOLDSMITH et al. v. NATIONAL S. S. CO. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. April 29, 1896.) No. 103. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York. Wilhelmus Mynderse, for appellants. John Chetwood, for appellee. No opinion. Affirmed.
GOLD SOVEREIGN MIN. & TUNNEL CO. et at v. STRATTON. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. May 16, 1898.) No. 1,042. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Colorado. C. S. Thomas, W. H. Bryant, and H. H. Lee, for appellants. Charles J. Hughes, Jr., for appellee. Dismissed, with costs, per stipulation of the parties.
GOODENOUGH v. CARY. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. May 3, 1897.) No. 113. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Brleson & Knauth, for appellant. Henry A. Prince and Edward S. Beach, for appellee. No opinion. Affirmed on the opinion of the circuit court. 77 Fed. 827.
GOODWIN v. UNI'l'ED STATES. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. November 11, 1898.) No. 585. In Error to the District Court of the United
