889 F. 2d 1095 - Judd v. United States Judd
889 F2d 1095 Judd v. United States Judd
889 F.2d 1095
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Slater Alonzo JUDD, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, et al., Defendant-Appellee.
Slater Alonzo JUDD, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America; Drug Enforcement Administration,
Defendants-Appellees.
Nos. 88-15823, 88-15824.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 23, 1989.*
Decided Nov. 28, 1989.
Before ALARCON, O'SCANNLAIN and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.
Advertisement
MEMORANDUM**
These two cases have been consolidated for disposition.
By order of the district court dated March 25, 1985, the clerk was directed not to accept any new actions presented by Slater Alonzo Judd, Jr. without an order from a judge of the district court. Judd attempted to file complaints on December 8, 1988. The complaints were marked "received" but not filed. No order was issued in these matters. Therefore, we must dismiss for want of subject-matter jurisdiction. Dismissal of these appeals is without prejudice to the filing of petitions for writ of mandamus.
APPEALS DISMISSED.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for submission on the record and briefs and without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a), Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3