888 F2d 130 United States v. Gualotuna

888 F.2d 130

Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Julio GUALOTUNA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 88-5034.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Aug. 22, 1989.*
Decided Oct. 10, 1989.

Before BROWNING, KOZINSKI and RYMER, Circuit Judges.


Advertisement
view counter
1

MEMORANDUM**

2

The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the Government, was sufficient to permit the jury to conclude that defendant conspired to possess cocaine with intent to distribute, even though he did not participate in every act taken in furtherance of the conspiracy, see United States v. Sarault, 840 F.2d 1479, 1487 (9th Cir.1988), and that he was not entrapped. See United States v. Smith, 802 F.2d 1119, 1124-25 (9th Cir.1986).

3

AFFIRMED.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3