883 F. 2d 1024 - Save Our Streams v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
883 F2d 1024 Save Our Streams v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
883 F.2d 1024
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
SAVE OUR STREAMS, Petitioner,
v.
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent.
No. 87-7194.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 18, 1989.*
Decided Aug. 22, 1989.
Before WIGGINS, KOZINSKI and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
Advertisement
MEMORANDUM**
The orders of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission denying petitioner's motion for late intervention are affirmed. See Nos. 5756-005 (July 30, 1986) (Notice Denying Late Intervention); 5756-006 (Jan. 28, 1987) (Order Denying Appeal); 5756-009 (Mar. 27, 1987) (Order Denying Rehearing). Petitioner concedes it had actual notice of the application in mid-1985, shortly after the June 27, 1985, intervention deadline, and nearly a year before it filed its motion to intervene. Because petitioner has failed to show good cause for the delay, the Commission did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. See 18 C.F.R. Sec. 385.214(d) (1988).