852 F.2d 572
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Jirik PAREZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
GENERAL ATOMIC (Now GA Technologies), Defendant-Appellee.
No. 87-6128.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted June 7, 1988.
Decided June 30, 1988.
Before WALLACE, TANG, and FARRIS, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM
Parez appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of GA Technologies, Inc. The district court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1343. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291. We affirm.
Summary judgment was granted on the basis that there was no material dispute of the fact that GA Technologies is not the same entity as General Atomic Company and is not a successor in interest to that entity. No triable issue of fact was raised by Parez. Thus, the district court did not err in holding that GA Technologies was not a proper party to this action.
AFFIRMED.