842 F2d 1294 Soria v. R Bowen

842 F.2d 1294

Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Fred SORIA, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services,
Defendant-Appellee.

No. 87-1511.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted: March 16, 1988.*
Decided: March 21, 1988.

Before SNEED, CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL and NOONAN, Circuit Judges.

This court will affirm the Secretary's determination with respect to a disability claim if the Secretary's decision both (1) rests on substantial evidence; and (2) applies the proper legal standard. See, e.g., Fanning v. Bowen, 827 F.2d 631, 633 (9th Cir.1987). We have reviewed the record and the decisions below. We are satisfied that substantial evidence supports the Secretary's decision, and that the proper legal standard was applied.

3

Accordingly, the decision of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

The panel finds this case appropriate for submission without oral argument pursuant to 9th Cir.R. 34-4 and Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

842 F. 2d 1294 - Soria v. R Bowen

842 F2d 1294 Soria v. R Bowen

Advertisement