830 F2d 193 Applied Coatings International Inc v. Omnimax Inc P

830 F.2d 193

APPLIED COATINGS INTERNATIONAL, INC., et al., Plaintiffs,
Harry A. Beale, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
OMNIMAX, INC., Alan P. Magerman, Voting Trustee, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 87-3793

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

September 30, 1987.

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.

ORDER

Before ENGEL, MERRITT and RYAN, Circuit Judges.


Advertisement
view counter
1

This appeal has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

2

Harry Beale, one of the plaintiffs, sought leave from the district court to amend the complaint. Leave to amend was denied on August 5, 1987. Beale appealed the August 5 order.

3

An order denying a motion to amend or supplement a complaint is not appealable. Encoder Communications, Inc. v. Telegen, Inc., 654 F.2d 198, 202 (2d Cir. 1981). No final judgment or appealable order has been entered. Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay, 437 U.S. 463 (1978); Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949); Catlin v. United States, 324 U.S. 229 (1945).

4

It is ORDERED that the appeal be and hereby is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Rule 9(b)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.