800 F. 2d 260 - Smith v. A Rice Rb
800 F2d 260 Smith v. A Rice Rb
800 F.2d 260
Unpublished Disposition
Kermit SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Nathan A. RICE, Warden; Lt. Macabe; R.B. Seymour,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 86-7628.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted July 29, 1986.
Decided Sept. 8, 1986.
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Kermit Smith, appellant pro se.
James Peeler Smith, Office of the Attorney General, for appellees.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, CHAPMAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Advertisement
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Smith v. Rice, C/A No. 85-902-CRT (E.D.N.C., June 12, 1986).
AFFIRMED.