MEMORANDUM DECUlIONI.
1005
UNITED STATES v. LAWS. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Circuit. June 22, 1896.) No. 10. In Error to the Oircuit Oourt of the United States for the Western Division of the So llthern District of 0 hio. John W. Herron and Hal" Ian Cleveland, for the United States. Lawrence Maxwell. Jr., for defendant 'in error. No opinion. Judgment of circuit court affirmed.
UNITED STATES v. McCANN. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. December 13, 1895.) No. 525. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Wallace Macfarlane, U. S. Atty. Hartley & Coleman, for appellee. Reversed on stipulation that this cause abide event of U. S. v. Burr, 79 Fed. 1004.
UNITED STATES v. NORDLINGER. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Second CirCUit. October 21, 1895.) No. 580. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Wallace Macfarlane, U. S. Atty. Comstock & Brown, for appellee. No opinion. Appeal dismissed.
UNITED STATES v. PASSAVANT et al. (Olrcult Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. December 11, 1895.) No. 545. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. 'Wallace Macfarlane, U. S. Atty. S. G. Clarke. for appellees. Heversed on stipulation that this cause,abide event of U. S. v. Burr, 79 Fed. 1004.
court.
UNITED STATES v. VAUTINE et al. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Second CirCUit. December 17, 1896.) No. 524. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of' New York. Wallace Macfarlane, U. S. Atty. W. B. Couglitry, for appellees. No opinion. Affirmed in open
.
,
UNITED STATES v.ZEIMER et al. (Circuit Court ,of Appeals, Second Circuit. January 11, 1896.) No. 565. Appeal from the Circuit Court qf the United States for the Southern District of New York. Wallace Macfarlane, U. S. Atty. Comstock & Brown, for appellees. Dismissed on consent.
THE VALENOIA et al.v. ZEIGLER et aI. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.) Appeal from the District Court of the United States. F. R., Coudert and Jos. Kling, for appellants. W. W. Goodrich and J. A. Deady, for appel. lees. Certified to supreme court. See 17 Sup. Ct. 323.
WAPLES-PLATTER CO. et al. v. TURNER. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. September 15, 1896.) No. 643. No opinion. Judgment of dismlssal vacated and set aside, and cause restored to the docket.
1006
'J8 FEDERAL REPORTER.
WEATHERBY v. ST. LOUIS & S. F. RY. 00. (CIrcuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. May 23, 1896.) No. 805. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Kansas. L. F. Parker. for defendant in error. No opinion. Docketed and dismissed, pursuant to sixteenth rule, on motion of counsel for defendant in error.
WILLIAMS et a1. v. AMERICAN NAT. BANK OF KANSAS CITY. MO. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. :May 25, 1896.) No. 726. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri. JohnR. Walker, James R. Vaughan, and W. M. Williams, for plaintiffs in error. O. H. Dean, R. L. Goode, and J. C. Cravens, for defendant In errol'. Dismissed, without costs to either party in this court, per stipulation of counsel.
WILLIAMS v. GLENN. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.) No. 322. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of New York. George Zabriskie. for appellant. B. N. Harrison, Oharles Marshall, and A. H. Masten, for appellee. No opinion. Decree affirmed, with costs, on opinion in Furnald v. Glenn, 12 C. O. A. 21, 64 Fed. 49.
WOERISHOEFFER et a1. v. SMITH et al. (Oircuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. January 6, 1891.) No. 514. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of 'l'exas. S. R. Jones. for appellants. J. V. Lea, for appellees. Dismissed on stipulation.
WOODFIN v. HAMPTON &: O. P. RY. CO. et a1. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. February 8, 1897.) No. 207. Appeal from the CIrcuit Court of the United States for the Eastern DistrIct of Virginia. Robert M. Hughes, for appellant. Arthur S. Segar and Thomas Tabb, for appellees. No opinion. Upon suggestion of the appellant that the case involves the question whether an act of the legislature of Virginia is In conflict with the constitution of the United States, and that this court has no jurisdiction, appeal Is dismissed, with· out prejudice.
ZIMMERMAN v. UNITED STATES. (Circuit Court Circuit. November 11, 1895.) No. 679. Appeal from the United States for the Southern District of New York. McClelland. tor appellant. Wallace Macfarlane. U. S. consent.
of Appeals, Second Circuit Court of the Hess. Townsend & Atty. DismIssed on