1002
79 FEDERAL REPORTER.
'I1HE SAGINAW VALLEY. OALVIN et al v. ESOANABA TOWING & WREOKING CO. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. October 14, 1896.) No. 423. AppeaLfrom the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Michigan, Northern Division. F. Howard Mason, for appellants. '.lohn C. Richberg, for appellee. No opinion. Judgment affirmed.
THE SEGURANOA.. BROWN et al. v. PROCIDEDS OF THE SEGURANCA. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Second CIrcuit. May 12, 1896.) No. 709. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Cary & Whibridge, for appellants. Carter & Ledyard, for appellee. Discontinued by consent.
SEVERS et al. v. BULL. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. June 6, 1896.) No. 812. In Error to the United States Court of Appeals of Indian Territory. P. L. Soper and Thomas A. Sanson, Jr., for defendant in error. No opinion. Docketed and dismissed, pursuant to sixteenth rule, on motion of defendant in error. SEVERS et al. v. NORTHERN TRUST 00. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. June 6, 1896.) No. 811. In Error to the United States Court of Appeals of Indian Territory. P. L. Soper and Thomas A. Sanson, Jr., for defendant in error. No opinion. Docketed and dismissed, pursuant to sixteenth rule, on motion of defendant in error.
=== THE SINTRAN. MOSLE v. THE SINTRAN et aI. (Qlrcuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. February 7, 1896.) No. 574. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. George A. Black, for appellant. Wing, Shoudy & Putnam, for appellees. No opinion. Affirmed In open court. SIOUX CITY, O'N. & W. R. CO. v. MANHATTAN TRUST CO. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth CircUit. June 22, 1896.) No. 505. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Nebraska. Henry J. Taylor, for appellant. John L. Webster, for appellee. No opinion. Decree of affirmance vacated, and case restored to docket. Affirmed by a divided court, and costs equally divided.
=
SIOUX CITY, O'N. & W. R. CO. et at v. MANHATTAN TRUST CO. (CIrcuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. June 22, 1896.) No. 661. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Nebraska. John C. Coombs and Henry J. Taylor, for appellants. John L. Webster, for appellee. No opinion. Decree of affirmance vacated, and case restored to docket. Af· firmed by divided court, and costs ellually divided.
SPENCER et al. v. USELTON. (CirCUit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. May 5, 1896.) No. 463. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States tor the Northern District of Georgia. Dorsey. Bruce & Howell, for appellants. Reuben R. Arnold, for appellee. Cause dismissed on agreement of counsel.
MEMORANDUM DECISIONS.
1003
STABERG v. OLIVER MIN. 00. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Clrcnlt. December 23, 1896.) No. 815. In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota. John Rustgard, for plaintiff in error. William W. Billson, Chester A. Congdon, and Daniel A.. Dickinson, for defendant in error. No opinion. Affirmed, with costs.
STAHL v. WILLIAMS. (Circuit Court of' Appeals, Second Circuit. December 3, 1895.) No. 567. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Connecticut. Mitchell, Hungerford & Bartlett, for appellant Newell & Jennings, for appellee. DIsmissed by consent, without costs.
STEINER et al. v. UNITED STATES. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. January 23, 1895.) No. 398. Appeal from the CIrcuit Court of the United States for the Southern Distri<.1: of New York. E. B. Smith, for appel· lants. Henry C. Platt, Asst. U. S. Atty. No opinion. Decree affirmed in open court. TOD et at v. HUBBARD. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. April 13, 1896.) No. 704. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Iowa. George W. Wickersham, Daniel B. Henderson, Louis G. Hurd, Francis B. Dauiels, and George 'W. Kiesel, for appellants. John C. Coombs and Henry J. Taylor, for appellee. No opinion. Affirmed by a divided court, and costs equally divided.
TOWN OF CRIPPLE CREEK et at v. MICHIGAN PIPE CO. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. January 4, 1897.) No. 890. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Colorado. Charles M. Brown, for appellee. No opinion. Docketed and dismissed, with costs, pursuant to the sixteenth rule, on motion of counsel for appellee.
TOWN OF PHELPS v. BRIGGS. (Circuit C('urt of Appeals, Second Circuit. July 29, 1896.) No. 748. In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of New York. S. D. Bentley, for plaintiff In error. No opinion. Dismissed, pursuant to the sixteenth rule.
UNION SWITCH & SIGNAL 00. et at v. PHILADELPHIA & R. R. CO. (>t al. SAME v. ATLANTIC CITY R. CO. et at (Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. January 27, 1897.) Nos. 37, 38. Appeals from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. George H. Christy, for appellants. Wm. Houston Kenyon, for appellees. Dismissed per stipulation of parties. See 75 Fed. 1004.