74 F. 3d 1245 - Harrington v. F Maass
74 F3d 1245 Harrington v. F Maass
74 F.3d 1245
David Olon HARRINGTON, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Manfred F. MAASS, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary,
Respondent-Appellee.
No. 95-35170.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Jan. 10, 1996.
Decided Jan. 22, 1996.
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Before: NOONAN, LEAVY, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
Advertisement
ORDER*
We affirm the judgment of the district court and find, relying upon the reasons set forth in the district court's opinion, that the error at trial in requiring David Olon Harrington to wear a stocking mask before the jury did not so taint the jury's verdict as to require reversal under Brecht v. Abrahamson, 113 S.Ct. 1710 (1993).
Accordingly, we AFFIRM.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3