654
I'EDERAL REPORTF.R,
vol. 69.
THE FINANCE. BEDFORD et at. v. NEWPORT NEWS SHIPPING & DRY DOCK CO. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. October 30, 1894.) Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York. . . Carter & Ledyard. for claimants and appellants. Benedict & Benedict, for libelant and appellee. Discontinued by consent.
HUMPHREYS HOMEOPATHIC MEDICINE CO. v. HILTON. (CircUit Court of Appeals, second Circuit. January 23, 1895.)
Appeal from th,e Oircuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Henry F. Homee, for appellant. Wise & Lichtenstein, for appellee. Discontinued by consent.
JOLIET NAT. BANK v. THIRD NAT. BANK OF CITY OF NEW YORK. (Oircuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. No.34. Appeal from the Oircuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Jackson Wallace, for appellant. Thos. G. Shearman, for appellee. Dismissed by consent. November 14, 1894.)
McALLIST'ER et at. v. TEBO et at. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. March 11, 1895.) Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. J. A. Hyland, for respondents and appellants. Goodrich,. Deady & Goodrich, for libelants and appellees. Appeal dismissed, pursuant to the twenty-third rule.
THE MARK K. CAMPBELL.
noss
v. HOUGHTON et aI. May 31, 1895.)
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Wilcox, Adams & Green, for intervening mortgagee, appellant. H. D. Hotchkiss, for appellees. Appel" dismissed by consent.
'MEMORANDUM ',DECISIONS.
65G
THE MARY McWILLIAMS A.ND THE CITY Oll' BROCKTON. McWILLIAMS et at v. DELAWARE &8. CANAL CO. (Circuit Court ot Appeals, Second Circuit. October 30, 1894.) Appeal from the Circuit Court ot the United States for the Southem 011trict of New York. Carpenter & Mosher, for claimants ot the Mary McWllllams and appellants. S. Hanford, for claimants of the City of Brockton aD!l appellee. David Willcox, for libelants and appellees. . Stricken from calendar for fallure to answer call of docket, pursuant to tIle ..venteenth rule. MAYOR, ETC., OF CITY OF NEW YORK et at v. WORKMAN. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. May 6, 1895.) No. 118. Appeal trom the Dlmrlct Court of the United States tor the SouthemDI8trlct of New York. Application for certification to the supreme court ot the United Statell. U. nled. NEW YORK & H.R.R. CO. v. ACCUMULATOR CO. (Olrcuit Court ot Appeals, Second CIrcuit. March 13,1893.)
Appeal trom the CIrcuit Court of the United Statel tor the Southern DIItrlct ot New York. W. H. Kenyon, for appellant. Frederick H. Betts, for appellee. Stricken from the calendar for tallure to answer the call ot the .,pursuant to the seventeenth rule.
PRESS PUB. CO. v. FALK. (Circuit Oourt ot Appeals, Second Circuit. No. 27. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States tor the Southem DII'trlct of New York. Platt & Bowers, fOJ: complainant and appellant. BennQ Lewinson, for defendant and appellee. Dismissed by consent. November IS, 1894."
.
PROVIDENT FUND SOC. v. WILLIAMS. (Olrcult Court ot Appeals, Second, Circuit. March 13, 1895.) Appeal. from the Circuit Court ot the United States tor the SoutherD DI"'" ·.t rlct ot New York. A. M. Sanders, for appellant. Carter, Hughes & Kellogg, for appellee. No opinion. Dismissed, pursuant to the stxteenth rule.