MEMORANDUM
65a
CLEVELAND, C., C. & ST. L. RY. CO. v. FOSTER et at (Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. Nos. 19 and 20. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Lourey, Stone & Auerbach, for appellants. Henry Melville, for appellees. Order of discontinuance on consent. November 12, 1894.)
THE DELAWARE. THORNE v. WINNETl' et aL (Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. April 16, 1895.) Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York. J. Parker Kirlin, for appellant. Harrington Putnam, for appellees. Before WALLACE, LACOMBE, and SHIPMAN, Circuit Judges. No opinion. Certified to the supreme court of the United States as to the -effect of the act of congress of February 13, 1893, and, if decided adversely by that court, the order is to be affirmed.
EDISON ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. et al. v. ACCUMULATOR CO. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. November 11, 1894.) No. 131. Appeal from the Oircuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. E. H. Lewis and John R. Bennett, for defendants and appellants. Betts, Hyde & Betts, for complainant and appellee. Before WALLACE and SHIPMAN, Circuit Judges, and TOWNSEND, District Judge. No opinion. Affirmed. EDISON ELECTRIC LIGHT CO. et al. v. et at (Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. November 14, 1894.) Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern DIstrict of New York. Eaton & Lewis, for appellants. Hobbs & Gifford, for appellees. Order entered on stipulation of consent withdrawing appeal. ElSING et al. v. OSBORN et al. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. October 13, 1894.) Appeal from the Circuit Oourt of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Rose & Putzel, for appellants. Jones & Govin, for appellees. Dismissed, pursuant to the twenty-third rule.
654
I'EDERAL REPORTF.R,
vol. 69.
THE FINANCE. BEDFORD et at. v. NEWPORT NEWS SHIPPING & DRY DOCK CO. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. October 30, 1894.) Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York. . . Carter & Ledyard. for claimants and appellants. Benedict & Benedict, for libelant and appellee. Discontinued by consent.
HUMPHREYS HOMEOPATHIC MEDICINE CO. v. HILTON. (CircUit Court of Appeals, second Circuit. January 23, 1895.)
Appeal from th,e Oircuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Henry F. Homee, for appellant. Wise & Lichtenstein, for appellee. Discontinued by consent.
JOLIET NAT. BANK v. THIRD NAT. BANK OF CITY OF NEW YORK. (Oircuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. No.34. Appeal from the Oircuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Jackson Wallace, for appellant. Thos. G. Shearman, for appellee. Dismissed by consent. November 14, 1894.)
McALLIST'ER et at. v. TEBO et at. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. March 11, 1895.) Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. J. A. Hyland, for respondents and appellants. Goodrich,. Deady & Goodrich, for libelants and appellees. Appeal dismissed, pursuant to the twenty-third rule.
THE MARK K. CAMPBELL.
noss
v. HOUGHTON et aI. May 31, 1895.)
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Wilcox, Adams & Green, for intervening mortgagee, appellant. H. D. Hotchkiss, for appellees. Appel" dismissed by consent.