50 F. 3d 17 - United States v. Lee
50 F3d 17 United States v. Lee
50 F.3d 17
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Michael Anthony LEE, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 94-50399.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 7, 1995.*
Decided March 13, 1995.
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Before: SNEED, POOLE, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges.
Advertisement
MEMORANDUM**
Michael Anthony Lee appeals his conviction and 70-month sentence imposed following the entry of his guilty plea to bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2113(a).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Lee's counsel submitted a brief stating the he finds no meritorious issues for review. Counsel also filed a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), discloses no issues for review. Accordingly, the motion of counsel to withdraw is GRANTED and the judgment is AFFIRMED.