46 F. 3d 1145 - Stamford Hotel Csh-Stamford Hotel Limited Partnership v. Prudential Securities Inc
46 F3d 1145 Stamford Hotel Csh-Stamford Hotel Limited Partnership v. Prudential Securities Inc
46 F.3d 1145
STAMFORD HOTEL, a Texas limited partnership, by its managing
general partner, CSH-STAMFORD HOTEL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a
Texas limited partnership; 42nd West 48th Street Limited
Partnership, a Texas limited partnership, by its managing
general partner, CSH-48th Street Limited Partnership, a
Texas limited partnership; 400 Madison Avenue Limited
Partnership, a Texas limited partnership, by its managing
general partner, Csh-Madison Avenue Limited Partnership, a
Delaware limited partnership, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES, INC., a Delaware corporation;
Prudential Securities Group, Inc., a Delaware
corporation; Prudential-Bache
Properties, Inc., a Delaware
corporation,
Defendants-Appellees.
Nos. 93-55802, 93-55804 and 93-55806.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted: Oct. 6, 1994.*
Decided: Jan. 13, 1995.
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Before: D.W. NELSON, NORRIS, and BOGGS**, Circuit Judges.
Advertisement
MEMORANDUM***
The facts and legal issues in this case are essentially identical to those set forth and decided in 680 Fifth Avenue Assocs. v. Prudential Securities, Inc., No. 93-55458, issued today.
On the authority of that memorandum, the decision of the district court dismissing the complaint in this case is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4
The Honorable Danny J. Boggs, United States Circuit Judge for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or used by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3