396 US 119 Carlos v. New York

396 U.S. 119

90 S.Ct. 395

24 L.Ed.2d 303

Louis CARLOS
v.
NEW YORK.

No. 524.

Supreme Court of the United States

December 8, 1969

Herald Price Fahringer and Eugene Gressman, for petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York

PER CURIAM.


Advertisement
view counter
1

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed, Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767, 87 S.Ct. 1414, 18 L.Ed.2d 515.

2

THE CHIEF JUSTICE and Mr. Justice HARLAN are of the opinion that certiorari should be denied. However, the case having been taken for review, they would affirm the judgment of the state court upon the premises stated in Mr. Justice HARLAN's separate opinion in Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 496, 77 S.Ct. 1304, 1 L.Ed.2d 1498 (1957), and in his dissenting opinion in A Book Named 'John Cleland's Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure' v. Attorney General of Com. of Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413, 455, 86 S.Ct. 975, 16 L.Ed.2d 1 (1966).