352 F. 3d 938 - Encore Videos Inc v. City of San Antonio
352 F3d 938 Encore Videos Inc v. City of San Antonio
352 F.3d 938
ENCORE VIDEOS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CITY OF SAN ANTONIO, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 00-51119.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Filed December 4, 2003.
Arthur Myron Schwartz, Michael W. Gross (argued), Schwartz & Goldberg, Denver, CO, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
Donald S. Bayne (argued), Michael P. Hodge, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellee.
Doreen Eva McGookey and James Bickford Pinson, Asst. City Attys., Dallas, TX, for City of Dallas, Amicus Curiae.
G. Randall Garrou, Weston, Garrou & DeWitt, Los Angeles, CA, for FTU, Inc., DAJO, Inc., Ice Embassy, Inc. and Texas Richmond Corp., Amici Curiae.
Beatrice A. Mladenka-Fowler, Mladenka-Fowler & Associates, Houston, TX, for City of Houston, Amicus Curiae.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas; Samuel Fred Biery, Jr., Judge.
Advertisement
Before SMITH and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges, and CUMMINGS,* District Judge.
BY THE COURT:
We clarify our opinion, 330 F.3d 288, by stating the following: The opinion does not overrule SDJ, Inc. v. City of Houston, 837 F.2d 1268 (5th Cir.1988). Indeed, no panel has the power to overrule the opinion of a previous panel. Patterson v. Mobil Oil Corp., 335 F.3d 476, 485 (5th Cir.2003). In addition, the ordinance at issue was found not to be narrowly tailored because of both its failure to make an on-site/off-site distinction and its low 20% inventory requirement.
Notes:
District Judge of the Northern District of Texas, sitting by designation