249 F3d 336 At&t Communications of the Southwest Inc

249 F.3d 336 (5th Cir. 2001)

AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF THE SOUTHWEST, INC.; ET AL., Plaintiffs,
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF THE SOUTHWEST, INC.; TAYLOR COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Defendant,
SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, Appellant.
CAPROCK COMMUNICATIONS CORP.; GOLDEN HARBOR OF TEXAS, INC.; WESTEL, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Defendant,
SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, Appellant.
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, LP, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Defendant,
SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, Appellant.

No. 99-11397

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS, FIFTH CIRCUIT

April 17, 2001

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

Before HILL,* JOLLY, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge:


Advertisement
view counter
1

The petition for rehearing filed by Sprint Communications Company is DENIED.

2

On March 26, 2001, Teligent, Inc. submitted a letter requesting a correction in the language of the March 15, 2001 opinion in this case. Treating the letter as a petition for rehearing, the petition is granted as follows: Footnote ** will be added after the first sentence of the first paragraph. This footnote will read as follows:

3

Southwestern Bell filed a motion to dismiss its appeal against Teligent, Inc. ("Teligent"), which this court granted on March 30, 2000. Thus, the judgment in favor of Teligent is not affected by this appeal.

4

In all other respects, the opinion remains unchanged, and all other relief is DENIED.

NOTES:

*

Circuit Judge of the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation.