141 F. 3d 1178 - Riley v. R Alley
141 F3d 1178 Riley v. R Alley
141 F.3d 1178
2 Cal. Bankr. Ct. Rep. 51
Stephen Lynn RILEY and Nancy Sue Riley, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Frank R. ALLEY, Judge, in his private capacity; Fred Long,
Trustee, in his private capacity; Jeffery Wong,
Special Assistance Attorney in his
private capacity, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 97-35886.
D.C. No. CV-97-06090-MRH.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
.
Submitted Mar. 10, 19982.
Decided Mar. 19, 1998.
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael R. Hogan, Chief District Judge, Presiding.
Before FLETCHER, BEEZER, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM1
Advertisement
Stephen and Nancy Riley appeal pro se the district court's dismissal of their complaint for damages against United States Bankruptcy Judge Frank R. Alley III, Chapter 13 Trustee Fred Long, and Special Assistant United States Attorney Jeffrey M. Wong. The Rileys allege "perjury and perjury by oath of office, violation of fiduciary responsibilities, conspiracy to commit fraud all giving rise to the unlawful deprivation of constitutionally secured rights." The district court dismissed the complaint based on the defendants' immunity. We affirm for the reasons set forth in the district court's order filed July 2, 1997.
AFFIRMED.