139 F. 3d 906 - Moore v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 569
139 F3d 906 Moore v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 569
139 F.3d 906
Lawrence MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL 569;
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers; J.J.
Barry; S.R. McCann; Dick Robbins; San Diego Electrical
Pension Trust; San Diego Electrical Health and Welfare
Trust; San Diego Electrical Industry Training Trust; San
Diego Electrical Industry Education and Manpower Development
Trust; Labor Management Cooperative Fund; San Diego
National Electrical Contractors Association; Fischbach &
Moore, Inc.; Tom Pridemore; Paul Blackwood; Wayne Lovin;
Jim Westfall; Wilmer Bass; Dick Smith; Terry Godshalk;
Joe Heisler; George England; Ray Altmeyer; John Simpson;
Jim Alysworth; Charles Wilder; Joe Mansolillo; Ron
Cooper; Dave Allison; Ken Stuart; Dave Raspolich; Wayne
Van Der Linden; Jack Zwart; Mike Sparks, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-55495.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Feb. 13, 1998.
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Advertisement
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Rudi M. Brewster, District Judge, Presiding
MEMORANDUM*
Moore finally contends that the district court erred by requiring a $2,000 bond because Moore already had a balance of $906.28 remaining of the $1,000 bond he had posted in his first appeal of CV-91-1543. We disagree. The district court properly awarded the balance remaining of the $1,000 bond to the trust defendants pursuant to liens the trust defendants had against the $1,000 bond, making a new bond necessary.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3