132 F. 3d 41 - United States v. McCord
132 F3d 41 United States v. McCord
132 F.3d 41
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Carlos Edward McCORD aka Carlos McCord, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 97-50097.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 15, 1997.**
Decided Dec. 18, 1997.
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Linda H. McLaughlin, District Judge, Presiding
Before: SNEED, LEAVY and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
Advertisement
MEMORANDUM*
Carlos Edward McCord appeals his sentence for conspiracy to possess methamphetamine with the intent to distribute and possession of methamphetamine with the intent to distribute. His counsel submitted a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. McCord submitted a pro se supplemental brief.
Our independent review of the record discloses no issues for review. Accordingly, we grant counsel's motion to withdraw and affirm the district court's judgment.1
AFFIRMED.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3
McCord's motion for appointment of counsel is denied