127 F. 3d 1104 - Fernandez-Baeza v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
127 F3d 1104 Fernandez-Baeza v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
127 F.3d 1104
Jorge Eliecer FERNANDEZ-BAEZA; Carmen Dianet Fernandez;
Giovanna Fernandez, Petitioners,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.
No. 96-71111.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 20, 1997.**
Decided Oct. 24, 1997.
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Before: THOMPSON, T.G. NELSON and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.
Advertisement
MEMORANDUM*
Jorge Fernandez-Baeza, his wife and his daughter, natives and citizens of Colombia (referred to collectively hereafter as "Fernandez") petition pro se for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals, dismissing their appeal of the immigration judge's denial of their applications for asylum and withholding of deportation pursuant to 8 U.S.C. §§ 1158(a) and 1253(h).
In this petition, Fernandez does not challenge the BIA's denial of his asylum and withholding claims, but contends instead for the first time that he is entitled to suspension of deportation. Fernandez has waived any challenge to the denial of his claims for asylum and withholding of deportation by failing to raise those issues in his opening brief. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1259 (9th Cir.1996), petition for cert. filed, 65 U.S.L.W. (2/18/97) (No. 96-1789). Moreover, by failing to properly raise his suspension of deportation claim before the BIA, Fernandez has not exhausted his administrative remedies and we must dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. See Vargas v. INS, 831 F.2d 906, 907 (9th Cir.1987).
Petition for review dismissed without prejudice to filing a motion to reopen with the BIA.
DISMISSED.