127 F. 3d 1104 - Asare v. Casa Descanso Convalescent Hospital
127 F3d 1104 Asare v. Casa Descanso Convalescent Hospital
127 F.3d 1104
Akua ASARE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CASA DESCANSO CONVALESCENT HOSPITAL, a California
Corporation; Prestige Property Management Inc., a
California Corporation; Maria Regalado, an individual, Zsa
Zsa Wible, an individual, Georgiana Tucci, an individual,
Susanna Cabrera, an individual, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 96-56295.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Oct. 20, 1997.**
Decided Oct. 24, 1997.
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding
Before THOMPSON, T.G. NELSON, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.
Advertisement
MEMORANDUM*
Akua Asare appeals pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment for defendants in her civil action alleging discrimination and harassment on the basis of race and national origin in violation of federal and state law as well as various state-Law tort claims. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court's grant of summary judgment, see Warren v. City of Carlsbad, 58 F.3d 439, 441 (9th Cir.1395), and we affirm.
Asare did not file an opposition to defendants' summary judgment motion. The district court reviewed the materials submitted by defendants to determine whether they demonstrated the absence of a genuine issue of material fact. Upon our review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not err by granting summary judgment for defendants. See Henry v. Gill Indus. 983 F.2d 943, 949-50 (9th Cir.1993).
AFFIRMED.