124 F. 3d 214 - United States v. Lopez-Soto
124 F3d 214 United States v. Lopez-Soto
124 F.3d 214
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Rogelio LOPEZ-SOTO, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 96-30018.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 8, 1997.**
Decided Sept. 12, 1997.
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, No. CR-95-00091-6-HJF; Helen J. Frye, District Judge, Presiding.
Before: HALL, BRUNETTI, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Advertisement
MEMORANDUM*
Rogelio Lopez-Soto appeals his sentence for his guilty plea conviction to distribution of cocaine and unlawful entry in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1). Lopez's counsel has submitted a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Because our review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), discloses no meritorious issues for review, we AFFIRM the district court's judgment and GRANT the motion of counsel to withdraw.