110 F. 3d 68 - Gilbert v. State of Oregon
110 F3d 68 Gilbert v. State of Oregon
110 F.3d 68
George D. GILBERT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
STATE OF OREGON; Oregon Department of Corrections; Frank
Hall, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 96-35295.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 24, 1997.*
Decided March 26, 1997.
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Before: SNEED, FARRIS, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Advertisement
MEMORANDUM**
Oregon state prisoner George D. Gilbert appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Gilbert alleged that defendants violated a settlement agreement previously entered between the parties governing the provision of kosher meals to Gilbert. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Barnett v. Centoni, 31 F.3d 813, 815 (9th Cir.1994) (per curiam).
We affirm the district court's summary judgment for defendants on Gilbert's claims regarding his kosher diet for the reasons stated by the district court in its March 5, 1996 opinion.
Because Gilbert has failed to present any facts or legal argument regarding summary judgment on the remainder of his claims, the claims are deemed abandoned. See Acosta-Huerta v. Estelle, 7 F.3d 139, 144 (9th Cir.1993) (holding, in pro se appeal, that claims not supported by argument are deemed abandoned unless failure to consider them would result in manifest injustice).
AFFIRMED.