106 F. 3d 409 - United States v. Blankenship
106 F3d 409 United States v. Blankenship
106 F.3d 409
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Ernest Lee BLANKENSHIP, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 96-30119.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 8, 1997.*
Decided Jan. 14, 1997.
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Before: ALDISERT**, PREGERSON, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Advertisement
MEMORANDUM***
After a thorough review of the record and the briefs of the parties, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court.
The panel finds this case appropriate for submission without oral argument pursuant to 9th Cir.R. 34-4 and Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)
Honorable Ruggero J. Aldisert, Senior Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, sitting by designation
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3