103 F.3d 143
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Nicolas PALAFOX-CUEN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 96-10184.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Nov. 5, 1996.*
Decided Nov. 7, 1996.
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Before: PREGERSON, REINHARDT, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
Nicolas Palafox-Cuen appeals his conviction and 24-month sentence following a guilty plea for illegal reentry after a felony conviction in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), (b)(1). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Palafox-Cuen's counsel filed a brief stating that he finds no meritorious issues for review, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), discloses no issue for review. Accordingly, the motion of counsel to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED.